Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Assad Terror Regime's Latest Crimes

Assad's newest terror weapon: barrels of explosives, packed with nails and other such crude shrapnel (of the type terrorists such as the Boston Marathon bombers and others employ) and dropping them out of helicopters onto Aleppo. Among the targets: schools (a favorite Assad target, which he also likes to firebomb) markets, traffic circles; in other words, where people, especially young people, congregate and can be slaughtered in significant numbers. About 200 people have been killed in one day of such attacks in Aleppo, which along with Damascus is one of Syria's two major cities. Assad's terror air force is now flying 100 sorties a day.

The regime also just murdered a doctor they had held in captivity (and no doubt tortured) for months, days after cruelly telling his family he was about to be released. The regime is big on psycho-sadistic touches like that. (The doctor's “crime” was treating people wounded by the Assad barbarians who lived in areas Assad lost control of.)

The country has been virtually destroyed at this point. Actual physical starvation is confronting many Syrians now. A few days ago 8 infants froze to death, their families having been driven from their homes.

Yes yes, the rebels have at times retaliated by killing Alawites and Druze, on the assumption that they support the regime. And the jihadists have now exerted supremacy over the original rebels. But this situation has been over two years in the making. I notice the Saudis and their Gulf satellites aren't shy about backing the jihadists with arms and money, making the indigenous rebels no match for them. The jihadists have been killing off the rebel commanders of the disjointed so-called “Free Syrian Army” (for lack of a better term for the numerous ad hoc bands of armed men desperately trying to throw off the yoke of tyranny) and just stole a warehouse full of non-lethal supplies and vehicles supplied by the U.S., causing the U.S. to cut off the spigot out of which they belatedly started dribbling aid this year after about two years of dithering. (After he leaves the presidency maybe Obama should try out for a community theater production of Hamlet.)

Remember, this all began with Syrians protesting for democracy and the Assad regime's “reply” that consisted of murdering them in the streets. That made it clear that the decades-long Assad dictatorship, one of the world's most repressive, would never end except through armed force. That led to the armed rebellion which at first had the regime on the back foot. Had the U.S. and its lackey nations meaningfully supported the rebellion with material aid early on, there is a very good chance that the regime would have been overthrown.(The base of Assad's support are the Alawites, which are a small minority of the population, and even smaller minorities that feel beholden to Assad.)

Here we have again another example of how impractical amoral power politics can be. Had the U.S. behaved morally, the practical results would likely have been better. Now the U.S.' main reason for keeping hands off the situation (but not lips off, they did plenty of jawboning and jabbering, exhorting Assad to quit and leave, as if that would ever happen short of force), namely a fear of jihadists taking advantage of the situation, is exactly what has happened, since the indigenous, original rebels are too weak to resist the better armed, better organized, and fanatical jihadists. (But to be sure, there were plenty of opportunist phonies sitting in Turkey and elsewhere claiming to “command” the “Syrian Free Army” or to comprise a quasi government-in-exile, who hurt the rebellion with their fecklessness.)

Funny species, homo sapiens is. It wages weird power struggles with its own kind, a few trying to rule the many, and then organizing the many to attack others to seize more territory and subjugate more people. This is the story of several thousands of years of what is deemed “civilization.” (As if hunter gatherers were barbaric by comparison.)

What is the answer? Surely not to just throw up one's hands in despair, or affect a jaded, world-weary attitude, as epitomized by the Harper's magazine editorial stance, or by the late Gore Vidal. The hard work of activism and organization is the only possible way to achieve any progress in the human condition. Which- surprise!- the rulers of every country make as hard as possible. And with their massive tools of surveillance and repression, this is especially true of the U.S., which sees it as its global mission to snuff out all progressive movements everywhere in the world.



No comments: