I guess my title pretty much sums up what just happened in
Missouri, Colorado, and Minnesota. Meaningless “votes” by a few tens of
thousands of arch-reactionary whites that didn't even choose convention
delegates. Excuse enough for the corporate propaganda system to indulge in two
of its favorite games, Presidential election as horse race, and hyping
“momentum.” (“Big Mo!”)
For example, these meaningless glorified opinion polls among
small bunches of reactionary fanatics “gave him an important lift,” the
NY Times “reported.” As if
that's a fact and not an opinion. [“
Another Twist for G.O.P. As Santorum Fares Well,” 2/8/12, p. A1.]
“With his unexpected victories, Mr. Santorum was also suddenly presenting new
competition to Newt Gingrich as the chief alternative to Mr. Romney, the
front-runner.” “His performance added another twist to an unruly nominating
contest that has seen Republican voters [cadres of arch-reactionary whites]
veering among candidates...”and blah blah blah. It's extra-exciting because
Santorum's “candidacy [was] all but dismissed just days ago...;” by the
mediaocracy, I guess they mean. Santorum's pointles victory [sic] comes “after
Romney won Nevada, a “contest” in which a grand total of 16,000 (white
reactionaries) voted for
all four of the GOP horses still in the race.
The corporate media breathlessly narrates the competition
among the reactionary politicians to be President exactly like a horse race:
“Gingrich is surging, HE PASSES ROMNEY! But now Romney's in the lead, AND NOW
SANTORUM HAS COME FROM BEHIND TO OVERTAKE HIM! and Ron Paul's at the back of
the pack. Folks, this is the most exciting race we've seen in a long time!”
Gee, I can hardly wait to see which extreme right-wing
Republican politician wins! Will it be “moderate Mitt,” a centimillionaire who
insists that “corporations are people, my friend,” and thinks the poor are
sitting pretty in America? (Go check out the things he's been saying during his
campaign, and indeed during his last run for President, and in the intervening
years, to see what the corporate oligarchy's propaganda system means by “moderate.”)
Or Gingrich, a crazed liar who has declared his intention to ignore court
decisions he decides are “wrong,” thus crowning himself an absolute
monarch? Or maybe it'll be Rick Santorum, the sex-hating fanatic who wants to
control everyone's sex lives through brutal state repression, equates
homosexuality with bestiality and pedophilia, is chomping at the bit to go to
war with Iran, destroy the EPA (but he's not the only one). Or could it be Ron
Paul, who “the” media would have us believe is beloved by youth, a Texas
Confederate who would revert to “states' rights” racism (his naked racism is
thoroughly documented in his newsletters, which he now claims to have never
read and was unaware of their content,
an absurd claim now refuted by ex-employees who state that he assiduously
proofed each issue prior to publication) and who wants to abolish the Federal
Reserve? (Who needs a central bank anyway? We got along fine in the 18th
century without one.) Can we even measure the difference between these sick
bastards under a microscope?
Thus does the corporate media continue provide a running
narration of the thrilling horse race between a gang of extreme reactionary
politicians, one worse than the other, hyperventilating the whole time, while
legitimating the extreme ideology and vicious policy promises on display by
treating them as wholly normal and respectable. Indeed, since now in America
“conservatism” is the ONLY respectable ideology, even “liberal” denigrated as
weak and surrenderist on “national defense,” “hollowing out” the military,
coddling of criminals, spoiling of “welfare cheats,” (those lazy [black] poor
people,) “conservatism” owns the commanding heights of political and
ideological legitimacy.
Of course “conservatism” is a respectable-sounding euphemism
which dignifies the most vile, anti-human, immoral policies, namely; even more
aggression abroad, killing masses of Third World people; ever-increasing
immiseration of the poor domestically; making the cancer epidemic even worse by
eliminating environmental regulations; more and more power for the secret
police state and increased repression of dissent [the Democrats are doing that
too, as much as the GOP, so there's no difference there- we dissidents are now
subject, thanks to Obama, to permanent imprisonment in military gulags with no
legal process whatsoever, merely by having the label “terrorist” applied to us,
as the FBI and police routinely do to protesters of all progressive stripes];
virtual elimination of taxation of the rich with an increasing tax burden on
the middle and lower classes; elimination of the basic human right of women to
control their own bodies by terminating pregnancies and using birth control;
elimination of the few remaining workers' rights, targeting their organizations
for destruction or impotence; continued mass imprisonment (with 5% of the
world's population, the U.S. already has 25% of the world's prisoners) which is
another bipartisan policy; and ever-increasing amounts of money shoveled into
the maw of the military-industrial complex. (The Democrats what to level it off
at the current enormous amounts.)
The extreme reactionaryism and racism of the GOP makes the
evil conniver Barack Obama look good by comparison, if only because he isn't
openly demented in what he advocates. His policies are typical Democratic
policies, Republican-Lite. I've documented many of his evil crimes in other
essays. So we're supposed to breathe a sigh of relief that the next wave of
vicious assaults on our lives aren't as bad as we were made to fear they could
be, had we failed to panic and rush to the polls to save ourselves by voting
for the lesser evil once again.
This sick con game actually dates back to Woodrow Wilson, who
inaugurated the systematization of political repression in America with
the Alien and Sedition Act. It's long past time for people to see through the
game and organize a genuine political opposition. Why more people don't rally
to the Green Party, for example, or vote for Ralph Nader, which are just the
first steps towards actually seizing real power and changing this evil system,
is somewhat unfathomable. In historical terms it's analogous to trying to
puzzle out the phenomenon of Adolf Hitler; while there are lots of
explanations, at some fundamental level it seems inexplicable.