Posts
Robert
Bales, the American Army Sergeant who went off base and killed 16
Afghan civilians in their homes, including 9 children, and then
burned their bodies, is a disposable cog in a massive military
machine designed for global domination, a willing tool of an
Imperialist power system. Deployed four times into war zones (3 times
in Iraq), separated cumulatively for years from his wife and two
small children, under financial strain, and finally, seeing one of
his comrade's legs blown off a day or two earlier by a mine courtesy
of the ungrateful Afghans, who at a minimum protect by their silence
(sometimes fear-induced) the Taliban trying to kill the Americans, he
finally snapped under the strain put on him. That is, his emotions of
rage overwhelmed his self-control.
Bales
joined the military shortly after the flashy attention-grabbing
9/11/01 Al-Qaeda attack on the U.S. Like many people, his sense of
dedication to his country and people was used against him, to make
him a tool of cynical power-wielders (Bush, Obama, and the entire
gang of apparatchiks constituting the U.S. Government institutional
machinery), a chump, a fool, whose instincts of group loyalty and
willingness to sacrifice for the group made him vulnerable to
exploitation. (1)
One
argument being planted in the U.S. media by anonymous
military/official “sources” is that lots of soldiers have done
multiple tours of “duty” in the war zones and didn't snap. That's
reminiscent of the argument that not all poor people commit crimes,
therefore poverty has nothing to do with crime.
That's
just silly of course. Consider this analogy; parts in machines fail
all the time. Why don't all the parts fail? Because 1) the
parts have a different history of stresses on them, 2) the parts may
look identical outwardly but have subtle differences on a structural
and/or molecular level. People are incredibly complex. When you
subject large numbers of them to stress, it is predictable that some
will “snap” (break) under the stress over time.
The
people calling the shots in the U.S. system are attempting to deflect
blame from themselves for using loyal soldiers as cannon-fodder as
they pursue a hopeless Obama “strategy” of seeking the
unattainable goal of “victory,” or at least “stability” for
the corrupt Karzai kleptocracy. They keep whispering in reporters'
ears that Bales was drunk, and had marital difficulties- assertions
denied by his family's lawyer. Already a battle of dueling narratives
of who Bales is has begun, fought out on the terrain of the U.S.
media. Thus has the trial already begun, in the media.
The
military has a pro forma system of pseudo-mental health
screening in place, purely for show. Military psychologists and
psychiatrists understand, and do, their real job: making sure the
maximum number of personnel are deemed “fit for duty” and
deployed. This is what happens when an Empire can no longer
involumtarily press men into the military to fight its wars for it.
Shortages result.
The
amazing thing is that there aren't more Baleses breaking under the
stress. Mostly U.S. troops are keeping their resentment and hatred
and fury towards the Afghans under sufficient check that it doesn't
manifest itself in murder.
We
must also hold open the possibility that Bales did not act alone,
contrary to the U.S. media depiction of events and its tacit
portrayal of Afghan claims to the contrary as hysterical and
irrational. The U.S. has, throughout its Afghan “campaign,”repeatedly committed war crimes and atrocities, and then lied throughits teeth about them. [Click for examples.] Sometimes it has gotten away with it, sometimes
not. (“Not” means finally being forced to do a limited hangout
and admit to a watered-down version of the truth, “apologize,”
and pay a few bucks to survivors. In one case, of the serial killers
exposed by Rolling Stone, the soldiers were actually
court-martialed, although not punished appropriately for cold-blooded
murders.) Of course, this is a U.S. military pattern that extends
back to Iraq, Vietnam, the conquest of the Philippines, and numerous
other places. Guess you could call it a “tradition.”
In
face, none other than notoriously tactless Special Forces GeneralStanley McChrystalblurtedout "We'veshot an amazing number of people and killed a number and, to myknowledge, none has proven to have been a real threat to the force."
More
and more, the Afghan crusade is becoming reminiscent of Vietnam. A
hopeless attempt by U.S. Imperialists to impose their will on a
small, seemingly weak country, using misguided patriots to do the
dirty work, which inevitably degenerates into atrocities and war
crimes as the war is revealed as a war against the people of the
target country, with feckless, cynical, thieving indigenous “allies”
the U.S. thinks it can prop up as a “Government.” Which it can't.
Once
again, the hubristic American Imperialists (and the two parties are
identical in this regard) think that since they are so powerful, with
a military capable of wreaking such great destruction, that surely
they can impose their will on the situation. They don't seem to learn
the fundamental lessons from experience. Instead they continue to
craft techno pseudo-solutions, as epitomized by fancy
“counterinsurgency doctrines” and fancy weaponry like drones,
using them to commit more murder and mayhem, which thrill then and
fill them with pride. (2)
Make
no mistake, Afghanistan is an awful place, with a horrible,
anti-human, backward culture. Of course, that's thanks to the U.S.,
Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, which prevented the Soviets from dragging
the country kicking and screaming into the 20th century.
Deliberately
letting bin Laden escape from Tora Bora, as the Bush regime
apparently did, set the stage for an endless, futile war. Bush didn't
want to fight it- he immediately turned his attention to settling
scores with Saddam Hussein in Iraq. And as long as the U.S.
Imperialists refuse to face the real problem- Pakistan, the
nuclear-armed patron, sponsor, and enabler of the Taliban, which
provides them sanctuary, Afghanistan can be nothing more but an
unhealable wound. And if carpet bombing North Vietnam with B-52s and
fighter-bombers, and invading and/or bombing Laos and Cambodia didn't
solve the “sanctuary problem” in that war, it's laughable for
Obama and his regime to think that a few hundred CIA drone
assassinations will win this war. But the way they keep tacitly
boasting about it with planted articles in the media, that's what
they seem to think. They're delusional.
In
fact, given that Obama is using drone warfare in a number of
countries now, apparently the plan is permanent global assassinations
to try and contain Islamic jihadism. My guess would be it will make
it worse, as the more murders the U.S. commits, the more Muslims
become radicalized and replenish the ranks of the jihadists. It's
rather like the situation in The Sorcerer's Apprentice.
- Bales has a bit of an unsavory past. In 2000, he was fined for defrauding a couple in his work as a Wall Street broker. He refused to pay the fine and was kicked out of the securities industry. (New York Times, 3/20/12.) He also has a record of an assault, which he was allowed to get away with, and a hit and run accident causing property damage, also swept under the rug, presumably because he was needed as a soldier. (Both occurred after he joined the Army.) Being white no doubt helps too.
- In 2009, a CIA drone killed Baitullah Mehsud, head of an Islamofascist group called Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). The upshot? He was succeeded by an even more vicious terrorist fanatic named Hakimullah Mehsud. (Mehsud is a Pashtun tribal name.) Now, Baitullah doesn't deserve having a single tear shed for him. Among his many crimes, he apparently arranged the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, with the connivance of then-”President” Pervez Musharraf. (Musharraf was head of the Pak armed forces who came to power in the traditional way, via a coup that overthrew the actually-elected civilian president. For awhile, he affected to call himself “President” while continuing to be the top general, until, partly due to external pressure, he figured it would look better- more legit- if he resigned his military command and just went with “President.” The U.S. media virtually never mentioned how the loathsome and extremely mendacious Musharraf came to power, so as to not embarrass him. They, like the U.S. Government, were invested in shoring up Musharraf's faux legitimacy just as Musharraf himself was.) Bottom line, the U.S. won't defeat this malign ideology via decapitation, no more than killing the President of the United States, or the CIA Director, or Secretary of “Defense,” or Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, would call the collapse of the U.S. Government or military or secret police. It's not like when the CIA murdered Martin Luther King, Jr, and Robert Kennedy, which ended political movements. Maybe that spoiled them.
Or
it could be force of habit, as the CIA's stock in trade is preparing
death lists and arranging
killings.
That's what they did all over Latin America, and in Vietnam (the
Phoenix program), and
even
in places most Americans would be surprised to learn about, like
Saddam Hussein's Iraq, where they helped him exterminate communists.
But that was when he was a “friend.” Oh, the CIA also fingered
Nelson Mandela for capture by the South African apartheid racist
regime- that cost Mandela 25 years in prison- but at least he lived,
unlike literally millions of other people the CIA has helped arrange
to be killed or killed directly.
Jasonzenith.blogspot.com
taboo-truths.blogspot.com
