Right-wing political groups asked for
additional information before IRS recognition of them as tax-exempt-
SCANDAL!
Associated Press phone records secretly
seized by the Department of “Justice:” NOT a scandal. (Yet.)
IRS “targeted” Tea Party groups
requesting tax-exempt status. Actually the IRS subjected them to more
careful vetting than usual, asking for more information, which
delayed the granting of the status. But they're free to operate as
tax-exempt while waiting. [1]
All the establishment media
keeps calling it “targeting.” Yet it turns out that liberal
groups were also subject to delays and lengthy questionnaires. One of
them shut down as a result. I only heard or read one report
about that. If you missed it, you're still being misled to believe
that the right-wing was “targeted.” [2]
Not sure how one person at a desk
sending out questionnaires constitutes “targeting” anyway. [See
“Confusion and Staff Troubles Rife at I.R.S. Office in Ohio,” New
York Times, May 18, 2013, paragraph 3.]
Meanwhile the secret rifling through
the phone records of Associated Press employees last year by Eric
Holder's minions at the Department of “Justice” isn't deemed
scandalous. Guess because the Republicans hate the media too. Instead
they're rehashing the Benghazi, Libya, attack last year by Islamists
that killed the U.S. ambassador and some guards. Okay, Obama put out
lies because he was afraid a “terrorist” attack would hurt his
reelection prospects. Too bad the Democrats are incapable of just
saying that. Instead they sent UN Ambassador Susan Rice, who's
close to Obama, to FIVE- count 'em, FIVE- Sunday morning TV political
palaver programs in one day to put out the agreed upon line that a
mob was spontaneously inflamed by a dopey anti-Prophet Muhammed
video, grabbed their AK-47s and RPGs and mortars out of their larders
and expertly assaulted the guarded and fortified U.S. compound. (It
only sounds ridiculous when you include details like that. So leave
out the details! Brilliant plan, Barack!)
Hey, it worked. He got reelected,
didn't he?
So why don't the Democrats just drop
the bullshit and say Obama didn't want to jeopardize his reelection?
I mean, as the inimitable Hillary Clinton says, What difference does
it make?
That is to say, dead is dead.
Oh, that would be “cynical” of
them, I suppose, to just come clean. That is, politicians are
expected to maintain a facade of false at all times, lest their
subjects- excuse me, “We The People,” lose trust in government.
Wouldn't want that to happen, now would we! (Someone must be a bit
out of touch if that's their concern. That horse left the barn a few
years ago.)
One thing is a little sad. The
ambassador who got killed, Christopher Stevens, if we are to believe
the U.S. media accounts, actually was a decent guy. If the U.S. ever
adopted a pro-human foreign policy, people like him would be
important assets. Ironic that the sons of bitches, the John
Negropontes of the world, never get what's coming to them. Instead
it's the good guys who catch the karmic retribution. (That's not an
endorsement of the Islamofascists who in this view are agents of that
karma. I don't actually believe in karma. How about we just call it
“blowback” and leave it at that.)
1] The issue is the particular
tax status being sought by these Tea Party types. A political
organization can have tax-exempt status, but it has to reveal its
donors. These reactionaries seek to hide their donors' identities.
(They should start something called the Bashful Billionaires Club.)
In order to do that, they have to pretend they're “social welfare”
organizations. This is what the mendacious Karl Rove does with
Crossroads America, for example. The real problem with what the IRS
did is that it just went after the small fry, apparently too
politically weak to enforce tax law against blatant violators like
GOP poohbah Rove. After all, Republicans control the House of
Representatives, semi-control the Senate, the corporate media is
mostly pro-GOP, and for that matter the men with the guns, the
military and secret police and regular police, are overwhelmingly
reactionaries and thus Republican- and that's no small thing. Oh, and
most of the large corporate upper hierarchy is Republican.
There's a totally specious argument
that reactionaries have trotted out at times to justify the need to
hide their moneybag donors' identities. They point out that people
who gave to the NAACP back in the 1950s and '60s were risking their
lives. Good argument. Wouldn't want the KKK to kill the Koch
brothers! (Uh, when exactly was the last time that a racist or
fascist killed a rich reactionary? Oh, right, it was never.)
2] Brian Nailer, NPR Weekend
Edition Sunday morning, when no one is listening, 5/19/13. A news
co-op providing stories for the New York Times went out of
business because of dilatory IRS tactics. Without IRS recognition of
their tax-exempt status, they couldn't get necessary foundation
funding to continue. So the only known actual IRS victim in
the story gets ignored because it doesn't fit the “IRS targeted
conservatives” script.
{Are you missing out on something everyone else is
getting? Besides sex. Are you missing out on getting email alerts to
new posts here? Well we can fix that! All you have to do is go to the
top of the page and on the right side enter your email under “Follow
By Email,” click on “Submit,” and our dedicated staff of
machines will do the rest. It's that easy!
Now, let's figure out some way to get you laid...}