California has long been a leader in
pioneering new methods of police state repression. The Los Angeles
Police Department (LAPD) in particular has long spearheaded the drive
to put police in control of society. Over the years its infamous
chiefs, such as Parker and Gates, have been driven by ideological
fanaticism.
Now NPR reports (Morning Edition,
5/7/13) that the ACLU is suing just to get access to a sample of a
license plate data base the LAPD has assembling. In a secretive mass
surveillance program, the LAPD has been surreptitiously recording the
license plates of all cars driving down the street and creating a
searchable database. Of course the LAPD refuses to talk about it-
their excuse now is the standard “cannot comment because it's the
subject of a lawsuit.” There's no law or rule that prevents
government agencies from talking about a topic because they're being
sued. For a private individual, it may be wise to refrain from
comment, especially if they're being criminally charged. But
governments and their arms should have to explain themselves.
Of course, this horribly repressive
development will be justified as a “crime-fighting tool.” But
much of its use will be to track dissidents, activists, and
politicians. [See also: "FBI Used Facial Recognition Software To Identify Boston Bombers"]
For some insight into the nefarious
political repression activities of the LAPD, you could start by
reading the book The Glass House Tapes, an account by Louis E.
Tackwood of his experiences as an agent provocateur and infiltrator
of black and leftist groups for the “intelligence” division of
that Department. [Amazon.com has it.] He also describes various
operations he learned of. (Of course the LAPD secret police unit
works closely with the FBI in particular, as well as other police
state agencies including the CIA, which is “banned” from domestic
operations. HAH. Funny joke the establishment made when they created
the CIA.)
Speaking of California police state
operations, a few decades ago there was an FBI-run right-wing
terrorist organization in San Diego called the Secret Army
Organization. Apparently this was used to intimidate people seen as
leftists, and maybe as an assassination unit. Anyway, one fine
evening an undercover FBI agent and an SAO terrorist were stalking a
“left-wing” college professor, and they were in their car outside
his house. The terrorist shot at a woman he saw inside, hitting her
in the elbow and crippling her permanently. That created a smallish
problem for the FBI. But not to worry. The U.$ media always has the
back of the secret police. And why not? The secret police are there
to serve and protect the corporate oligarchy. “The” media is the
mouthpiece, the propaganda organs, of that same corporate oligarchy.
So basically they are on the same side, if occasionally there are
minor conflicts or tactical differences between them. There can also
be criticisms of the competence of the secret police (or of the
media) in how they carry out their jobs. But no fundamental
critiques, and certainly no calls for real accountability- for
example criminal prosecutions for crimes committed by secret
policemen, (In best Orwellian fashion, referred to as “law
enforcement officers” in the case of the FBI and similar agencies.
The CIA, a global mega-terrorist outfit, is called an “intelligence”
or “spy” organization.)
Since the corporate media is a
hegemonic system of consciousness-control in America, as long as they
have the backs of the secret police, the secret police can persecute
progressives with impunity. Leftists are either ignored or reviled
and smeared by the corporate media. The crimes against them either go
unreported or are treated as insignificant.
[HEY, WHY NOT MAKE IT EASY TO KEEP UP
WITH MY TRENCHANT ANALYSES OF IMPORTANT EVENTS? Just go to the upper right of the page and add your email and
get alerts of new posts. You'll be glad you did! Or sorry,
perhaps. In which case you can unsubscribe, so don't be such a
big baby about it! Sign up today, before you forget.]
No comments:
Post a Comment