{VERY IMPORTANT MESSAGE AT THE END
OF THIS ESSAY!}
“National Security” Agency boss
General Keith B. Alexander used a Senate Appropriations Committee
hearing to claim that the just-exposed NSA spy programs had foiled
“dozens” of so-called “terrorism threats”- not all of them in
the U.S. Funny that the oppression establishment waited three days to
make this claim. And just what constitutes a “threat”? Sounds
like something less than a plot, say, much less an actual action. [1]
Anyway there is no reason to believe
him, especially about such a vague claim without any details. Who
knows what he's talking about?
Experience shows us that when they
claim to have foiled “terrorist plots,” there's a lot of
exaggeration involved.
And the secret police bosses lie every
single time they make a public statement.
Yet the establishment media, which must
know better, accords a presumption of believability and authority to
these liars' statements.[2]
He also claimed Congress “authorized”
his activities- even though “Congress,” that is, MOST MEMBERS OF
CONGRESS, have NO IDEA what the NSA is up to. And the few who know
more than most, the members of the so-called “Intelligence”
Committees in the House and Senate, are not allowed to tell anyone
what they know, including other members of Congress, on pain of
imprisonment.
Alexander also repeated the same lies
that others in the Obama regime are spouting, including Obama
himself, claiming he welcomes “debate” - putting out lies and
propaganda when caught is what they call “debate.” Alexander
actually had the nerve to say “We aren't trying to hide it.”
WHAT!!!
Like I say, the man has no credibility.
It's like someone saying the world is flat.
Another whopper was his claim that the
NSA is “protecting this nation and our civil liberties
and privacy” under the alleged “oversight” of the “courts”
(the secret rubber-stamping judges of the FISA court) and Congress.
[My italics.] Congress conducts no meaningful oversight over secret
police and secret military activities, which has been proven over and
over for years now. The NSA's blatant violation of Americans' rights
and illegal spying (now “legalized” at least to some degree by
the FISA rubber-stamps, which for some reason the Bush regime
couldn't be bothered to obtain) is what forced NSA whistleblowers
like William Binney, Thomas Drake, and others to complain internally
and finally to Congress, resulting in FBI terror raids on their homes
and heavy criminal charges, which they were eventually, at great
expense and energy and psychic wear and tear, able to escape from,
thanks in part to their visibility and political support from
concerned citizens.
FBI secret police chief Robert Mueller
also chimed in today, with the standard “national security” and
“protection” racket bullshit.
Senator Dianne Feinstein, chair of the
Senate “Intelligence” Committee, participated in the pacification
track of the oppression establishment's response to the disclosures,
claimed that the telephone records secret vacuumed up under the
particular program Snowden revealed involving those records, are
destroyed after five years. Believe her if you want.
Feinstein also let slip that the
purloined data records aren't used just for counterterrorism.
No kidding.
There are four main tracks to
the eatablishment's counterattack. One track is justification
of the spying, couched both in terms of protection of the American
people and of “national security,” and claims of legality and
oversight. Second is piteous cries of grave harm to their
power to spy- absurd on its face, yet this claim persists. A third
track is pacification, issuing soothing words like Obama's “no one
is listening to your phone calls,” a completely disingenuous and
dishonest claim typical of Obama. No, this particular NSA spy
program doesn't collect the voice content of the calls. That
is done under other programs. And of course various secret
police and regular police agencies listen to the calls of many tens
of thousands of people every year.
More pertinently to this particular
spy program, the information contained in the metadata in fact is
incredibly intrusive, as some people concerned with the increasing
evisceration of civil liberties and privacy have pointed out. Dianne
Feinstein and others contributed to Obama's minimization by claiming
the NSA is merely taking the same stuff as is on your phone bill.
(You might want to check your bill to see if it shows your location
for every call you made and the location of the other party for
every call, among other things that ARE NOT on your bill that the NSA
is collecting and saving.) [3]
The fourth track is reviling
Edward Snowden, calling him a traitor, and includes character
assassinations by the likes of David Brooks and Thomas Friedman in
their New York Times columns, and by Jeffrey Toobin, one of
these fake New Yorker magazine liberals. [4]
Another liar, vicious GOP Congressman
Peter King from Long Island, NY, slandered Glenn Greenwald, the
Guardian columnist who broke the story, claiming Greenwald threatened
to reveal the names of covert CIA officers. Greenwald called that a
lie, and referenced King's support for the Irish Republican Army,
officially a “terrorist” organization. King is a guy who revels
in murder, wants to murder Julian Assange, and was glad to see the
murder of the 16 year old son of Anwar al-Awlaki by U.S. drone, along
with his teenage cousins, in a restaurant two weeks after al-Awlaki's
assassination.
Murdoch's propaganda organ Fox “News,”
provided the platform for King's smear. King also called for the
prosecution of Greenwald and other journalists who publish the
information revealed by Edward Snowden, the former Booz, Allen
Hamilton Corp. systems administrator who “went rogue.”
By the way, “national security” is
code for U.S. power. That is very important to remember whenever you hear them invoke that term.
1] Alexander is also the
commander of the U.S. Cyber Command, the military arm that conducts
cyberwarfare, both offensive as against Iran, and defensive, as in
trying to stop Chinese cyberespionage.
2] Apparently I'm not alone in
my doubts about the veracity of Alexander. The NY Times
described unnamed members of the Appropriations Committee as
“skeptical” during his testimony. [“N.S.A. Chief Says Phone
Record Logs Halted Terror Threats,” 6/13/13, p. A18.] No word if he
was testifying under oath.
The article also quoted former high
ranking secret policeman Philip Mudd saying it's very hard for
“terrorists” to function without using electronic communications,
and that there's no way to do that without leaving a digital trail.
So much for the “grave damage to our capabilities” line James R.
Clapper, Jr, Obama's mendacious Director of National Intelligence is
pushing, as are others. He's the guy who lied in Congress in March
when Senator Ron Wyden asked him to his face if the NSA was
collecting Americans' data and he said no. Now he says that
lie was the “least untruthful” answer he could have given,
whatever that means. These people never cease to amaze with their
shifty circumlocutions.
3] For
more on the uses of metadata and the long corporate media coverup of
the massive NSA spying, these are good starting places with a number
of links: Daily Kos,
and the Government Accountability Project.
Also Jesselyn Radack has been giving interviews on this topic. (She's
a lawyer who represents persecuted whistleblowers. She had her
consciousness raised when she was at the Department of “Justice”
and warned that John Walker Lindh shouldn't be interrogated without
his lawyer, and shouldn't be tortured. Of course both were done, and
then she herself became a target of persecution, criminal
investigation, and was put on the no-fly list. Some of the details of
her persecution are at Wikipedia;
also in interviews at democracynow.org.
4] One
key leg of the character assassination of Snowden is sneering at his
lack of a high school diploma. Thus do these bourgeois professional
polemicists insult millions of people who never graduated high
school. I guess those millions are collateral damage in the propagandists' smear campaign. Nothing like a
little class snobbery by bourgeois blatherers.
Ironic thing is
that a good number of the very smartest people leave the U.S.
educational system before graduating high school because of its
mind-numbing, stultifying nature. But as far as these privileged
prattlers are concerned, they're all losers. Economically, most high
school “dropouts” are, but not Snowden: he was making a low six
figure salary before the age of 30.
{PSST!
Buddy! Over here! I got a secret to tell you....
There's this
special box on the top of this webpage. You put in your email
address, click Submit, and you get confidential messages that the FBI
and the CIA reads and the NSA collects and stores. And you can
read them too! They tell you whenever there's a new essay
posted here.
What? I told
you. The top of the page. On the right side. I said, it's
called “Follow By Email” I told you that already. Yes I
did. I did so tell you! Well I'm telling you now,
OK?! Don't be such a ballbuster, I'm doing you a favor here!! What
are you, an ingrate? Hey, I didn't have to tell you!! Don't
tell me to take it easy!!! Who do you think you're dealing with!!!!
Okay Okay I'm calm I'm calm! Just hurry up and do it before they take
it away. Whadda ya mean, “Who's gonna take it away?”! WHOEVER!
DON'T ASK SO MANY QUESTIONS AND JUST DO IT, OK?
Sheesh!
Some people just like to be difficult!}
No comments:
Post a Comment