Gee, that's odd. I thought that
“framework” worked out by the U.S. and Russia meant he was going
to hand them over, not “talk about” it.
He also called the UN chemical weapons
inspectors' report “unrealistic,” as if it was something from
Mars. (After all, it was the rebels' who gassed their own enclave,
don't you know. Even Russia agrees!)
Assad says the most outrageous things
as if he's being totally reasonable. He's willing to talk! Reasonable
guy!
As long as all you want from him is
listening to his sick bullshit, he's quite accommodating.
Actually he did put a price tag on the
handover: One Billion Dollars. And it will take a year. (Not a week,
as Kerry demanded in his off-the-cuff comment that started this
disarmament scheme ball rolling. (Or do we have to put “off-the-cuff”
in quotes now? Are we to believe this was all prearranged? If so,
it's bizarre.) Assad also had one of his lackeys claim they want a
“cease fire.” So peace-loving! His stooges in the West (both
leftists and rightists) will take that one and run with it, for sure.
Reminds me of Hitler constantly claiming to want “peace” while
extracting concession after concession from his appeasers. Gangster
methods don't change much.
And Russian neo-Czar Vladimir Putin is
keeping up the disgusting lie campaign of pretending the Syrian
rebels gassed their own area.
To make matters worse, the fanatical
foreign jihadists are now opening waging war on the Syrian rebels;
today they drove them out of a town on the Turkish border. So by
sitting on its hands, the U.S. has helped come to pass what it
feared, and why it sat on its hands- the growing strength of the
Islamofascists. Way to go, Obama. I repeatedly inveighed against this
stupid strategy starting way back. Obviously the way to prevent that
would have been to strengthen the indigenous rebels. Now the
Islamofascists are better armed than the original rebels. (Saudi
Arabia is partly to blame for that, of course. Some “ally.” The
U.S. keeps invading all the wrong countries. It should have invaded
Saudi Arabia, not Iraq, if it wanted to fight Islamofascist
terrorism. It should have invaded Pakistan, not [or in addition to]
Afghanistan to root out the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The U.S. doesn't
seem to know what it's doing. Meanwhile, under the pretext of
“fighting terrorism,” it steals all the communications of
everyone it can, including all Americans.)
Anyway, Obama is too busy building the
edifice of a total surveillance state, brick by brick, to do anything
decisive about Syria. Pay no attention to his blather about the vital
importance of upholding “international norms” and protecting
“our children” and international law and blah blah blah. He's
been bloviating in high-falutin' fashion at least since his national
debut at the Democratic Party Convention in 2004, where he retrod
already well-trod rhetorical ground with a “progressive” speech.
(Right-wing Democratic Goveror of New York State Mario Cuomo was
doing that for years, before Obama, as have many other Democratic
Party con men. It's a standard trick in the Democratic Party's bag of
deceit, deception, and manipulation.) Unfortunately there are
millions of willing dupes who should know better by now who eagerly
swill the vile Kool-Aid, because they want change but are too
cowardly to actually oppose the system, even if only to vote for
Ralph Nader or the Green Party. Even something that tame is too
“radical” for the Democratic Party's useful idiots.
No comments:
Post a Comment