Well, it’s over. And it’s just
starting.
The drama of the missing and presumed
kidnapped Israeli teenagers, who disappeared in the West Bank
hitchhiking home from religious school, has concluded Act One with
the discovery of their bodies in a shallow grave near Hebron by
civilian searchers. Act Two will be the intensification of the
violent Israeli response, which has already claimed the lives of
seven young Palestinians (including minors), the rounding up and
imprisonment of hundreds (who of course are being subjected to
Israel’s version of non-torture torture), mass raids and
destruction of property and the demolition of several homes already
with all their inhabitants’ earthly belongings inside- homes of two
men Israel blames for the killings of the three teens. [1]
The shooting of the Israeli Jewish
teens was “brutal,” a “brutal” killing. The shooting of 7
(and counting) Palestinians isn’t “brutal,” aren’t
“shootings,” aren’t even killings, in the active verb sense.
Palestinians are merely “killed,” as if by a falling tree branch.
“Seven Palestinians have been killed” by some unnamed force, is
how U.S. and much of the Western media describes it- when they even
mention it, which they do barely at all.
"There can be no forgiveness for
the killers of children and those who sent them. Now is the time to
act," Israel's economy minister, Naftali Bennett, said in a
statement.
The “liberal” British paper the
Guardian went into detail about the grief and pain of Israelis over
the fate of the three youths. They also got around to mentioning what
the Israeli military and police were doing in the meantime to the
Palestinians, in a brief paragraph, the tenth:
“The hunt for the three missing
youths has seen several hundred Palestinians rounded up in a massive
operation – often without charge or connection to the kidnapping –
and five [as of that writing] Palestinians, including a number of
minors, killed.” Check out the anonymizing phrase, “a number of
minors.”
That’s it on Palestinian losses and
suffering. Then the article returns to the business of focusing on
Israeli’s pain, and descriptions of weeping. [1]
Which I am not scoffing at. I am
pointing out the selective empathy, where the people of the
nation backed by the West is populated by feeling human beings, and
their victims, the Palestinians, are ciphers at best and terrorists
at worst. The deaths and maimings of Palestinians are mere
statistics. The destruction of tens of thousands of Palestinian homes
not worthy of mention, except occasionally one at a time as an aside.
Focusing on the handful of Israeli Jews who are occasionally killed,
and the mostly impotent rockets landing on Israeli soil, paints the
picture of the Israeli Jews as the victims of the Palestinians- a
grotesque and vulgar inversion of reality that Western publics have
been indoctrinated with over decades. Here is an example of lying
by selective emphasis, and
denying, ignoring, and deemphasizing what needs to be kept concealed
to sustain the grossly misleading, fundamentally mendacious
narrative.
The Guardian even serves up a
quote from a neighbor of the slain teens which neatly inverts
reality, and offers nothing to contradict or correct her utterly
twisted and delusional statement: "When the Arabs are doing the
killing the world stays silent, it is always Israel [who is
criticised]."
In some alternate universe, that is.
Maybe she’s living in one of those hidden extra dimensions
physicists like to speculate about.
Obama issued this fulmination: "The
United States condemns in the strongest possible terms this senseless
act of terror against innocent youth." Namely the Jewish youth.
On the Palestinian youths and young adults killed by the Israeli
army, not a peep. But then, there never is when Palestinians are
killed, as thousands have been over the years by Israel. But why
would the U.S., a nation that has murdered millions, complain about
that. It only denounces killings by official enemies.
This one-sided outrage has to be called
propaganda. If there was genuine humanitarianism and morality
operating here, the U.S. media and government wouldn’t be ignoring
the slayings of Palestinians. The Western Establishment is continuing
its decades-long policy of hostility and demonization of Palestinians
and complete backing of Israel.
The head of the U.S. parrot government
of “Great” Britain weighed in. British prime minister David
Cameron emitted this: "I am deeply saddened by the news that the
bodies of the three Israeli boys ... have been found ... This was an
appalling and inexcusable act of terror perpetrated against young
teenagers. Britain will stand with Israel as it seeks to bring to
justice those responsible." Nothing ever said about any of the 7
Palestinians killed. On top of the tens of thousands killed by Israel
starting in 1948, I might add. (And not only by Israel, but by Egypt
and the U.S. satrapy Jordan too. And of course the U.S. has killed
some too, for good measure.)
Israel’s Nazi-type tactics of mass
roundups, property destruction, and random murders are simply
mentioned in passing, neutrally, by Western media, and ignored by the
governments. Not worth paying attention to. The fate of three
teenaged colonists is of burning import.
The Israeli political bosses are
continuing to insist, as they have since the teens first went
missing, that Hamas is “responsible,” they did it, they’re
guilty, indeed in the words of Binyamin Netanyahu, the Remorseless
One, the culprits are “wild beasts.” (I.e. subhuman and thus
worthy of summary execution.) He issued a bone-chilling threat:
"Hamas is responsible, and Hamas will pay."
Hamas, as it has all along, continues
to deny they kidnapped, and killed, the teens. Hamas is in the
difficult position of trying to prove a negative. The Israelis, for
their part, have offered no evidence or factual assertions to back up
their claim that Hamas is guilty. Nor do they need to, since as far
as Western elites (government and media) are concerned, Hamas has
zero credibility so their denials can be discounted. Hamas is, after
all, branded a “terrorist” organization by the U.S. and its
Eurolackeys. Once an organization or individual is categorized as
“terrorist,” accusation equals proof, no evidence or facts
required. Thus the accusations of those with the power of life and
death becomes a conviction carrrying a death sentence. The chief
executive is a self-appointed judge, jury, and executioner. (Barack
Obama and Binyamin Netanyahu being two examples of this.) Mere
assertion of guilt is proof of guilt. Then the state carries out the
“sentence”- generally death by assassination.
Now, I have no idea whether Hamas, as
an organization, planned and carried out the kidnapping and slayings
of the three teens, or if people associated with Hamas, or
lower-ranking members, did it without higher authorization, or if
Hamas wasn’t connected with it at all. Let us keep in mind that
this occurred in the West Bank, around Hebron. Hamas is in Gaza. The
“Palestinian Authority” and Israel itself control the West Bank.
(“Judea and Samaria,” in Israeli-speak, a term, redolent of
ancient Holiness, which should leave no doubt about their intention
to absorb as much of that conquered territory as is practical for
them to do.) Secondly, coming so soon after a new unity government
between Hamas and the PA, the timing would be profounding
counterproductive. Israel has been at pains to keep the Palestinians
divided (a divided people are easier to oppress and rule), and went
ballistic when the unity agreement was announced just a few weeks
before the kidnapping. This has given Netanyahu a pretext to try to
smash up the unity government. Thirdly, Hamas has never been shy
about taking credit for their acts of violence against Israel and
Israelis, on the principle of The Deed as Propaganda. They build up
their credibility and reputation (and thus support) among
Palestinians by advertising their attacks. An act like this in which
they claim to have no responsibility does not bring them any
political benefit. It only brings ferocious Israeli assaults. The
only theory I can think of which would explain Hamas behaving in such
a way would be a desire by them to bring Israeli punishment on
Palestinians to radicalize them. But Palestinians hardly need to be
convinced to hate Israel at this point. And as I’ve pointed out,
the downsides are considerable.
Another possibility, and I am not
saying this is what happened, just that it is a hypothetical
possibility at least, is an Israeli false flag operation or a
manipulation of a radical group or individuals put up or steered to
doing this in order to have a pretext to try and violently break up
the Palestinian government. I doubt it, but given the ruthlessness
and cynicism of governments generally, and certainly of the Israeli
government, it can’t be ruled out categorically, although I would
put the probability as very low, like one percent or less. [3]
Another benefit for Netanyahu and
Israel from the martyrdom of the three teens is it allows a
psychological/emotional/propaganda pushback against the Boycott,
Divestiture, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which just scored a
victory when the Presbyterian church, in a close vote, voted to sell
stock in criminal corporations that supply Israel with important
weapons of repression, namely Caterpillar (armored home demolition
bulldozers), Motorola, and Hewlett-Packard (electronic surveillance
and police state computer equipment). This event received prominent
play in the New York Times, and evoked howls of outrage and moral
indignation from the usual prominent agents of Israel in the U.S.
Indeed, some of these American agents, acting as emissaries for the
Government of Israel, offered the Presbyterian leadership an audience
with Netanyahu himself (apparently this is to be seen as a great
privilege) if they would NOT EVEN TAKE A VOTE on divestiture. This
oh-so-generous offer was declined by the Presbyterians, and the vote
was duly held.
Already Jewish vigilantes, apparently
deciding that seven dead Palestinians aren’t enough, have
kidnapped, tortured, and murdered a 16-year-old Palestinian boy,
whose badly burned body was found. Israeli air raids have been
intensified. (A pregnant woman was wounded in one.) The Palestinian
firing of rockets into Israel from Gaza, which started as a reaction
to the massive Israeli sweep in the West Bank and has continued in
defiance of Israeli air raids, is used, as it always is, as the
“reason” for Israeli bombing runs (with free jets and bombs
supplied by the U.S.).
Past kill ratios of Jews to
Palestinians have ranged from 10 to 1 to 100 to 1. Since the current
ratio is only up to about 3 to one, there’s a way to go yet before
Israel’s thirst for revenge is slaked.
Whatever the Palestinians do, their
situation is hopeless. Peaceful protest, negotiation, violence,
terrorism, diplomacy- all is futile. Their fate is heartbreaking.
3] Given what we know
about what governments HAVE done, we would be foolish to rule out any
possibility. The assassination of the president of the U.S. in 1963
by the “security services” with the collaboration of others is a
prime example. Remember, also, that entrenched fascist elements of
the U.S. state, guided by none other than Richard Cheney, planted
nano-thermite explosives in the World Trade Center twin towers and in
7 World Trade Center, blowing them up September 11, 2001, a day that
should live in infamy for reasons still unknown to most Americans,
indeed to most people on this planet, thereby killing most of the
almost 3,000 people who died on that day, plus another 1,000 who
subsequently died from illnesses contracted from working in the ruins
without respirators, thanks to the homicidal lies by the Bush regime
and its Environmental “Protection” Agency head, Christine Todd
Whitman, a member of the New Jersey landed gentry, horsewoman, and
former Governor of that state, that the air was safe to breathe,
which it obviously was not. The ruins in fact gave off noxious fumes
that could be smelled miles away, for several months, and that caused
me for one to cough. The very notion that pulverized lead, asbestos,
concrete, and numerous hazardous substances contained in computer
equipment and etc. crushed to dust in the explosions and collapses,
was somehow harmless, is ludicrous on its face. So the kind of
ruthless people who rule many nations are certainly not inhibited
about sacrificing their own citizens in pursuit of their political
goals.
This should not surprise or shock
anyone. What, after all, is war, but the sacrifice of the citizens
for the Great Glory of the Rulers? (Yes, we can make exceptions for
defensive wars, but in those cases only one side is fighting in
self-defense.)