The reaction of the power structures of
the U.S. bloc to the shooting down of a Malaysian airliner over
Ukraine contrasts nicely to their complete silence- indeed ignoring-
of the deliberate murder of four Palestinian boys playing soccer on a
Gaza beach by an Israeli gunboat the day before. Or for that matter
the killing of around 700 Palestinians in the past few weeks in what
NPR calls an Israeli “incursion” (there’s euphemism for
invasion for you) or “fighting between Hamas and Israel.”
There is an overriding FACT that must
be stressed in the shooting down of the Malaysian airliner- that IT
WAS AN ACCIDENT! This is proven by the intercepted communications
released by the Kiev regime that they have been waving like a bloody
flag that they say are between the Ukrainian rebels and one of the
rebel commanders, and with a Russian intelligence Colonel. It is
clear from the recordings that the rebels thought they were shooting
down a Kiev regime military transport, and were surprised to find
Malaysian airliner markings on the wreckage when they got to the
scene. The BBC played excerpts, with translations, of these
recordings. (The details are below.) A New York Times reporter
interviewed on the BBC said there were “very many bombings in the
area” by the Kiev regime’s air force. Given that the area is
under aerial attack, and the rebels shot down a Kiev military
transport just a week earlier over the same area, it is not
surprising that such an accident would occur. Other airlines
previously rerouted their planes to avoid overflying the area, two of
them having done so months ago (CBS reported), and others within the
last few weeks. Malaysian Airlines, obviously incompetent and cheap,
to save money on fuel probably, refused to do so. Now the Malaysians
are saying they had every right to fly over the area, it’s
perfectly normal to do so. [1]
The FAA issued a warning on April 3rd
prohibiting U.S. carriers from overflying parts of eastern Ukraine.
The European Aviation Safety Agency also issued a warning to
airlines. Yet Malaysian Airline System flew right over an area that
has been under aerial bombardment for months and over which a
military transport jet had been shot down by a missile just three
days earlier on July 14th. [2]
Even their own evidence that it was an
accident didn’t stop the Western stooges installed in power in Kiev
from screaming “terrorism!” “atrocity!” and “crime!”
Western media are wringing their hands
in grief over the 300 or so people killed on the Malaysian jet.
They’ve barely uttered a peep about the hundreds of eastern
Ukrainian civilians killed by aerial and artillery bombardments of
their towns and villages by the Kiev regime.
And here’s an irony that apparently
escaped Ukraine kingpin, “president” Petro. O. “I’m
a Billionaire From Selling
Candy!” Poroshenko: in
2001, Ukraine shot down a civilian airliner and lied, denying it did,
until soon forced to fess up. [3]
So
accidents DO happen, contrary
to his immediate insistence that the downing of the plane was a
deliberate act of “terrorism.” For good measure, right-wing
Australian prime minister Tony Abbott, who was elected on a platform
of making global warming worse, demonstrated
his bona fides
as a U.S. stooge and political handmaiden by attacking the shoot-down
as a “crime.” His
Malaysian counterpart ran cover for the irresponsible, inept,
penny-pinching state airline company by insinuating criminality and
vowing to get to the bottom of it. (I say penny-pinching because
flying over the war zone was a shorter path to the plane’s
destination.)
It’s
germane to mention some deliberate
downings of civilian jetliners at this point. The Israeli
air force chased and shot down a Libyan airliner over the Sinai
desert (Egypt). The U.S. Navy shot down an Iranian airliner which was
flying in a civilian commercial air corridor over the Persian Gulf.
Both of these acts were deliberate. [4]
In
the last couple of days we have been fed a new propaganda theme, such
as by the BBC: the awful disrespect towards the bodies of those
killed in the Malaysian plane. This “disrespect” apparently
consists of the fact that all the corpses weren’t IMMEDIATELY
scooped up and delivered to the Netherlands. The BBC (and U.S.
corporate establishment media) hasn’t even whispered about the fact
that ambulances can’t even go to villages in Gaza under Israeli
bombardment because the Israelis deliberately shoot at the ambulances
to drive them back. Or that patients are being killed in hospitals by
Israeli bombardment. 46 schools and 7 hospitals in Gaza have been
bombed, and as usual, Israel is targeting UN facilities for attack.
But
the failure of a ragtag militia to immediately collect hundreds of
bodies strewn over a wide area- as if there are mortuary workers and
facilities there to handle it- that’s an outrage.
Contrast
all this with an actual deliberate crime that Israel committed a day
earlier, July 16th,
in Gaza, when using one of their gunboats they deliberately killed
four young boys playing football. (Called soccer in the U.S.) It was
a broad daylight attack witnesses by numerous journalists in a hotel
on the beach. A first shot missed them, and the boys started running.
A second shell finished them off. The journalists said the boys were
clearly recognizable to the naked eye as children from hundreds of
yards away, on a big empty beach. Obviously the crew of the gunboat
would have binoculars, not to mention sophisticated surveillance
equipment, plus aerial surveillance. Israel has been issuing blanket
statements blaming all civilian deaths in Gaza on Hamas, since Hamas
won’t surrender. The U.S. agrees and calls the bombings of 7
hospitals, 46 schools, numerous mosques, hundreds of homes,
ambulances and the power plant “self-defense.”
So
how did the Western media handle this? Well, it wasn’t uniform-
except in the U.S. The pretense that it must have been unintentional
was maintained, despite numerous journalist eyewitnesses. NBC
wouldn’t allow its own reporter, who saw the attack, to report it,
and immediately yanked him out of Gaza, obviously to put him on ice.
(NBC was forced to reverse the decision thanks to the empowering
nature of the Internet, which provides an alternative means of
communicating news outside the monopoly corporate propaganda system.)
BBC
didn’t use words like “horrifying” and “awful” for this
incident. No imputations of criminal intent were made by it or the
other organs of Western propaganda. There hasn’t been a weeklong
propaganda campaign beating the drums and rallying “the world” to
oppose Israel in righteous outrage, as they’re trying to do against
the Ukrainian separatists and Russia.
So
we have, on the one hand, a tragic accident in a war zone that has
been under attack from months by a regime that calls the people it is
killing “terrorists.” That accident is branded as “terrorism”
and a “crime.” On the other hand, a powerful nation is attacking
an already-besieged people, has killed as of this writing about 800
(75-80% of whom were civilians, according to the UN), has wounded
over 3,000, is bombing the hospitals, schools, and UN facilities, and
the reaction of the U.S. and its stooge nations and their media is-
gee, isn’t Hamas awful! They’re firing rockets at Israel.
Selective
outrage and selective indifference. And the explanation lies in
cynical power politics.
1]
The
BBC aired long
descriptions of wreckage and bodies, personal items on the ground,
from Sabrina Tavernise of the New
York Times.
“There’ve been many bombings by Ukrainian jets in the area
recently” she says, apropos of saying locals thought the explosion
was “just another bombing.” “It’s a very confused situation
on the ground.” Tavernise describes the plane “crashing
practically
on top
of their village, I mean it was very
close.” [Tavernise’s emphases.] BBC, July
18, 2014,
the
day after the shoot-down.
The Kiev regime put forth three tapes
of what they said were intercepted calls between the rebels and
Russia. The Kiev regime is pretending the tape prove the downing was
a deliberate act of terrorism. Assuming the tapes are genuine, in
fact they prove the shoot-down was an accident. (BBC played
excerpts showing that- a fact BBC then ignored.) The rebels thought
they’d shot down a military transport plane, then discovered when
they went to the wreckage site that it was a civilian plane,
resulting in cursing, not jubilation. There was mystification as to
why a civilian plane was flying over a war zone.
One call is between a rebel commander
and a Russian intelligence Colonel 30 minutes after the shoot-down.
The rebel reports that they shot down “a plane,” and men have
been dispatched to investigate. No mention of a civilian jetliner.
The Russian asks about “Pilots? Where are the pilots?” clearly
thinking it was a military plane and the pilots may have bailed out.
Another call, allegedly between “a
rebel commander and one of his officers” was played with
translation by the BBC: “What was it doing in the Ukraine’s
territory?” “That means they were carrying spies. They shouldn’t
be flying. There’s a war going on!” Then BBC “News
editor” Dina Newman
in the BBC studio comments on the tapes: “There seems to be genuine
surprise when they realize that a civilian plane was shot down
and they cannot understand why the civilian plane was flying
over an area where there was war going on.” [Her emphases.]
She mentions “a lot of swear words” that BBC didn’t translate.
The fact that this key “evidence”
of “guilt” put forth by the Kiev regime proves the shoot-down was
an accident is deftly elided by U.S. media. Meanwhile Western
political rulers from Obama on down are waxing wroth and fulminating
over the “outrage” and “crime.” Tragedy would be the correct,
that is, accurate and honest, word. But politicians deal in
cynical manipulation, thus speak propaganda, not accurate and honest
words.
2]
Obama’s
immediate response to the
shoot-down of the Antonov military transport, an
act of self-defense by the separatists fighting for their
self-determination and their own nation- they declared themselves a
new Republic, not part of Russia- was to heap harsh new sanctions on
Russia. OBAMA:
“Given its continued provocations in Ukraine, today I have approved
a new set of sanctions on some of Russia’s largest companies and
financial institutions.”
3]
On
October 4, 2001,
Ukraine shot down a Siberian Airlines Tupolev TU-154 civilian
airliner on its way to Tel Aviv, using an S-200 missile to do the
deed. The Ukrainian regime at the time lied about it and denied it,
before eventually ‘fessing up and saying it was an “accident.”
But
you didn’t know this
because
you’re relying on the “news” media to keep you informed. Big
mistake. You have to spent thousands of hours of your own time,
unpaid, reading all kinds of esoteric sources, to keep up on things.
Or rely on others who do. This interesting incident was in Aviation
Week & Space Technology,
a U.S. trade journal for military and civilian aircraft
manufacturers. It ran in the July 21, 2014 issue, “Malaysian
777 Shoot-Down Another Big Blow,” p.
12.
4]
For
the U.S. Navy crime, see “Vincennes: A Case Study,”
Proceedings
Magazine,
U.S. Naval Institute, August, 1993. Also see “U.S. Forces Down Plane of Bolivian President in Attempt to Kidnap NSA Whistleblower,”
July 5th,
2013, for more on air piracy by the U.S. and the U.S. Navy shoot-down
of TWA Flight 800.
No comments:
Post a Comment