Wednesday, January 21, 2015

They’ll Stop Jabbering About Obama’s State of the Union Address By Tomorrow



There’s an annual political ritual in the U.S. called the State of the Union Address. The president delivers a speech ghostwritten by a staff of speechwriters which is calculated to the nth degree. Every single word is parsed in advance for the political effect it might have. 

For a day or two leading up the Big Speech, and the evening and day after, the U.S. political Jabberariat flap their tongues nonstop about the alleged meaning of the speech. It’s like listening to baseball fanatics dissect a game play-by-play. Much ado about almost nothing. Like baseball fans, they are totally engrossed in this nearly meaningless event.

The professional political propaganda establishment media members seems oblivious to the fact that the vast majority of Americans have no interest in this ritual and could not tell you one single thing any president said in any such speech the day after. (I challenge the system’s pollsters to test this, without prompting those they poll. Just ask “can you name something the president said in his State of the Union speech last night? What was it?” I’ll bet money less than 10% could name a single specific.)

There is no reason to take anything Obama says seriously. He is a known con man and serial prevaricator. Even more than most politicians, every word out of his mouth is designed to manipulate, not honestly communicate. The only time you can believe him is when he’s promising to do something evil.

His speech hit on the usual “populist” tropes the Democratic Party trots out from time to time, posing as fierce advocates for the middle class and low-wage workers (while behind the backs of those struggling masses they work assiduously for the interests of their corporate masters and high finance). Recall that upon taking office Obama immediately appointed Wall Street’s men in the key power positions, venal conspirators like Lawrence Summers, Timothy Geithner, Rahm Emanuel, and their ilk. Obama raised more money from the barons of high finance than any politician in history in 2008.
Obama presented a sort of political wish-list. The only things that will pass the GOP-controlled Congress are the bad ones, like a call for a disguised declaration of war against ISIS (the nihilistic terrorist “Islamic State” and self-declared caliphate) and passage of yet another anti-worker “free trade” treaty.

Obama is a habitually insincere man with a years-long history of making false promises and proclamations. (Search “Obama” in the search box for this page next to the orange symbol and you’ll find plenty of examples.) He also has a penchant for talking out of both sides of his mouth at once. Here he is in 2009, answering a question about possible prosecutions for Bush-era torture.

“Nobody is above the law. And if there are clear instances of wrongdoing, that people should be prosecuted, just like any ordinary citizen. But that generally speaking, I am more interested in looking forward than I am in looking backwards.”

Of course Obama is obligated under the Torture Convention treaty that the U.S. signed and ratified to prosecute American government torturers. [1]

Ralph Nader incisively and succinctly exposed much of the bogusness in Obama’s latest blather in an interview on Democracy Now. Host Amy Goodman posed a question on “the whole issue of tax cuts and taxing the rich?” Nader replied:

Well, he was too vague on that. What he should have done is said that Ronald Reagan supported capital gains and dividend taxes like ordinary income, so there wasn’t this split where the rich get lower tax on their capital gains or dividend. And he didn’t tie in any idea of revenues for the public works program that he touted.

You know, Amy, State of the Union speeches are signaling presentations. They signal by what they say, how they say it and what they don’t say. And on that criteria, it wasn’t a very coherent speech. He stressed civil liberties and never mentioned what he’s going to do about the renewal of the notorious PATRIOT Act provisions. He said that there should be more oil and gas production, and then he warned about climate change. He said there should be strengthening unions and voices of workers, and then he took it away with the Trans-Pacific trade agreement, which exports jobs, and he wants to ram through Congress a voiceless fast track that prohibits amendments and labor from having a role in that deliberation.

And he didn’t even mention the hundreds of billions of dollars of commercial fraud on Medicare and Medicaid and patients in the private sector—hundreds of billions of dollars of corporate crime he never mentioned. He could have done a convergence with the Republicans on auditing the Pentagon, which sounds dull, but it’s a huge issue that the rank and file on both sides support, in contrast to the leadership in Congress. He could have easily converged, because as senator, Senator Obama teamed up with Senator Coburn, the Republican, to put the full text of hundreds of billions of dollars of corporate contracts online, so competitors, taxpayers, the media, the academia can analyze and prune the huge waste, fraud and corruption.

Also notice that he said again, "Close down Gitmo." We’ve heard that song before. Again, he didn’t mention the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at all.

And I think what is most troubling is what he avoided saying, like he desperately needs funding for his programs, like day care and so on. And he didn’t mention the squeeze on the IRS budget by the Republicans, so the IRS now cannot begin to collect what they say is $300 billion of evaded taxes every year. That’s $300 billion of evaded taxes, not avoided taxes, which David Cay Johnston will be talking about.

So, I think he missed a lot of opportunities. And it was not specific enough. It was not coherent enough. And he could have gone for more convergence with the Republicans, as I point out in great detail in my book, Unstoppable: The Emerging Left-Right Coalition to Dismantle the Corporate State.” [2]

Well, that’s a bit naïve at the end. Missed opportunities? That’s like saying Hitler missed opportunities to make peace. Obama’s ends aren’t Nader’s. One shouldn’t be fooled by Pied Pipers and con men.

 

2]Ralph Nader on What was Missing in President Obama’s State of the Union Address,” Jan. 21, 2015.

No comments: