Here's a piece of moderately good news
in this horrible world we're stuck in.
Five judges of the Supreme Court of
Appeal of South Africa have overturned the verdict of the trial judge
in the original trial of amputee athlete Oscar Pistorius, who
executed his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in his own home in
February 2013 after she made the fatal mistake of arguing with him.
They found that the trial judge, Thokozile Matilda Masipa,
erred in acquitting him of murder and finding him guilty instead of
lesser charges ( culpable homicide and a gun charge). They threw out
her verdict and imposed a conviction of murder, and sent the case
back to her to resentence Pistorius.
The Supreme Court ruled that “As a
result of the error of laws referred to and on a proper appraisal of
the facts, he ought to have been convicted not of culpable homicide
on that count but of murder,”
Masipa had meted out a sentence of just
5 years to Pistorius, and a suspended sentence of 3 on the gun
charge. In South Africa, people sentenced to no more than 5 years are
entitled to release after just one-sixth of their sentence. Thus
Masipa gave him a very generous gift. When his original release date
came up (ten months into his sentence) and he was about to be freed,
the public uproar was such at his release was delayed 2 months,
forcing him to serve a whole one-fifth of the sentence.
Pistorius' family and their spokeswoman
actually had the unmitigated gall to publicly whine that it was
“unfair” to Oscar to have to cool his heels two more months in a
prison hospital ward (to protect him), as if the earliest possible
release was his entitlement.
Given Judge Masipa's proven bias in
favor of the pistol-packing Pistorius, I anticipate she will sentence
him to the minimum for murder, 15 years. He will get credit for the 1
year he did in prison, and maybe for the months of mansion-detention
he has “served” since his release. I don't know how much of a
15-year sentence in South Africa must actually be served before
eligibility for parole. As Pistorius is an unrepentant murderer who
denies his guilt, he should have to serve the entirety of whatever
sentence he gets.
The motivation and cause of the
baffling reasoning of the trial judge have always been inscrutable to
me. I have speculated half-facetiously that maybe she unconsciously
resents pretty white blond women, and thus was inclined to let
Pistorius off easy. Or maybe she wanted to prove how “fair” she
is to white defendants by bending over backwards for this one. Or
perhaps she admires athletes. Or has an amputee fetish. Who knows? Maybe she's just a lousy
jurist. Certainly her decision in the trial flew in the face of the
facts and of common sense.
Now, the high court has ruled her
decision also flew in the face of South African law.
OhhHH! I don't WANNA go
back to jail!!
No comments:
Post a Comment