That seems very likely if we credit as
accurate the account in a Wall Street Journal article on the
Army Sergeant (neé
Private before two promotions given him while in captivity as an
apparent sop to his parents) traded after five years in the Taliban’s
talons for five ranking Taliban officials and commanders who were
imprisoned in the U.S. military gulag at Guantanamo Bay, occupied
Cuban territory. [1]
Promoting
Bergdahl to Sergeant was perhaps also a way to help justify swapping
five “high-value detainees” for him, as opposed for a trade for a
lowly Private. Maybe they should have made him a General. [2]
The
Wall Street Journal
account, based on interviews
with members of the Army unit Bergdahl lived with on the outpost in
Afghanistan he walked away from, states that Bergdahl frequently went
outside the American base to hang out with Afghan “police” at a
nearby outpost, and mused to his comrades about living among the
Afghans. One soldier says of Bergdahl: “I remember him asking me
what I thought it would be like to be with these people, how he could
see himself living in a culture like this, how it would be an
adventure to be like they are, running through the mountains.”
A
very telling quote. Bergdahl seems typical of a certain type of young
man, restless and full of energy, bored with the routine existence of
societies not in upheaval, seeking excitement. He was also an
emotional extremist, in the article’s telling, swinging from
wanting to kill Taliban to apparently romanticizing
at least Afghans generally
if not the designated foe.
Just before deployment to Afghanistan he asked his squad leader if he
could cut off the face of the first Taliban he killed and wear it as
a mask. (The squad leader’s
reply isn’t reported. I hope he told him no.) The article describes
his schizoid swings from exasperation at what he viewed as a too-soft
U.S. military strategy towards the Taliban to disenchantment with the
war.
But here’s the key fact: the
soldiers say that on the same day Bergdahl disappeared, two of the
Afghan “policemen” he fraternized with at the outpost
“mysteriously fled.” This leads to the obvious suspicion that he
asked them about blending into Afghan society or perhaps even joining
the Taliban, and they delivered him into Taliban captivity, probably
for money. [3]
This fact isn’t in the military
report on Bergdahl’s disappearance. On the other hand, while the
U.S. government has put it about that Bergdahl had a habit of
wandering off, his erstwhile comrades from Afghanistan had no
recollection of this, at least the ones the WSJ interviewed,
who presumably would know, as
this was a small outpost near the Pakistan border, not a major base.
[4]
Could this be another Benghazi-type
Obama regime deception? In the
Benghazi, Libya, killing of the U.S. ambassador and three U.S.
security guards there, the Obama regime rushed out with the false
story that the attack on the U.S. consulate was a spontaneous
reaction by an unorganized mob who were angry over a dopey
anti-Muslim video made in America by a Federal parolee with
mysterious funding. That story
was put out to try and stave
off anticipated political pain from the true story. It could be that
similar disinformation about Bergdahl merely being a guy with chronic
wanderlust is being told
to try and deflect or blunt criticism over the great deal the Taliban
got in the swap. So much better than Bergdahl being seen as a
deserter or traitor. (Which I’m not saying he is, just that he
looks more like
that when one deletes
the “prior wandering offs” from
the story. Personally I think he was an emotionally volatile,
immature young flake. But an empire can’t be too choosy about who
it enlists as its hired killers. Just look at the criminal scum the
French Foreign Legion welcomes with open arms- and provides with
pseudonyms to help hide
them! That’s a more extreme example to make the point. Look, is
wanting to kill and maim normal,
for
human beings?)
The
thesis of there being
another Obama spin operation
going on is buttressed by the fact that Bergdahl is being held
incommunicado in a U.S. military hospital in Germany. Bergdahl would
be likely to say something that undermines the Obama regime’s
“narrative,” especially around the circumstances of his
“disappearance.” [5]
Various media reports (e.g. NPR, New
York Times, the Daily
Beast) have stated that Bergdahl said he was held in a cage in
total darkness for several weeks following his two escape attempts
from them. (Hey, that’s a U.S. torture method too! So the U.S. and
the Taliban have something in common! Nothing like common ground for
bringing enemies together.) (See
footnote #5
below.)
But whatever Obama
would have done or not done, the Republicans and their media allies
would be attacking him. If he left Bergdahl in the Taliban’s
clutches, he’d be condemned by these same cynical partisans for
“abandoning an American soldier to terrorists.” And reportedly
those Taliban prisoners have been damaged by their twelve years in
captivity (mostly in solitary) at the tender mercies of the CIA and
U.S. military. One doesn’t recognize people he used to know (the
former Taliban deputy chief of “intelligence”). Apparently
they’re in pretty bad mental shape, and no doubt have physical and
brain damage from their years of torture and abuse. So there should
be no problem for Qatar to keep them on ice for the agreed-upon one
year. It’ll take them longer than that to psychologically recover
from their ordeal, if they ever do. [6]
So in a sense, the
“war on terror” is a war of Sadists vs. Sadists. Gee, which side
should we root for?
1] “Bergdahl’s Views
Shifted After First Taste of War,” Wall Street Journal, June
7, 2014, p.1. You can’t read it online unless you pay. Rupert
Murdoch instituted that policy after he bought the corporation that
owns the WSJ, Dow Jones, from a family that sits on the top
tier of the U.S. class system, the Bancrofts.
2] The New York Times,
in the next to last paragraph of a story, referred to the two
promotions as “automatic,” without explanation. If American POWs
are automatically promoted, I never heard of it before. “As Soldier Heals, Details Emerge Of His Captivity,” NY Times,
Sunday, June 8, 2014, pgs. 1 and 12.
3] I put “policemen”
in quotes not because I believe they were imposters, but because what
passes for “police” in Afghanistan does not meet a reasonable
definition of the word. Which is increasingly the case in the U.S.
too. “Corrupt gunmen” would be more accurate in the Afghan case.
Come to think of it, in the U.S. case too, given their penchant for
theft under the guise of “asset forfeiture,” and their increasing
tendency to murder and repress.
4] The New York Times
also reported that soldiers stationed with him in Afghanistan “said
they were unaware that he had previously wandered off the base, as
the internal Army review reported.” Maybe they were “unaware”
because it didn’t happen, huh Times? But the Times
leaves it at that, in one short, hidden paragraph, the 23rd
paragraph of a 30 paragraph story. Most of the time, the Times
bends over backward to protect the U.S. government and its
institutions. That’s why it’s so often tardy or entirely AWOL in
reporting scandals, ignoring them until they are widely reported
elsewhere and it has no choice but to weigh in, to manipulate
people’s attitudes and soften the blow to the establishment power
structure, as well as retain its own credibility as a newspaper.
Paragraph 22 consists of a single,
false sentence: “Just how and why Sergeant Bergdahl disappeared
remains a mystery to his fellow soldiers.”
If the Times had only said “some
of his fellow soldiers,” that might arguably be true. There’s
no “mystery” to those of his erstwhile colleagues who believe,
rightly or wrongly, that he deserted. And this evident attempt to
protect the Obama regime is undercut four paragraphs later in the
same story by a quote of Bergdahl’s provided by a Gerald Sutton,
who the Times identifies as someone “who knew Sergeant
Bergdahl from spending time together on their tiny outpost.” This
is the quote Sutton attributes to Bergdahl: “What would it look
like if I got lost in the mountains? Do you think I could make it to
China or India on foot?” To this Sutton adds “I genuinely thought
he was just kidding.” A reasonable if possibly mistaken assumption.
“Bergdahl Was In Unit Known For Its Troubles,” NY
Times, Sunday, June 8, 2014, pgs. 1 and 12.
5] Besides describing the
torture inflicted by the Taliban, The New York Times reported
on its front page that Bergdahl objects to being addressed as
“sergeant” in the military hospital in Germany where he is
currently being held in isolation. He’s being held there in part to
insulate him from the harsh attacks on Obama for exchanging five
important Taliban prisoners for him, and from the charges of
desertion that some of his former comrades and various media and
political poohbahs are leveling at Bergdahl himself. The Times
reports that he has received a letter from his sister but has not
replied. His family is being kept away from him, with the excuse that
his mental state prevents them from seeing him- a dubious rationale.
He is said to be physically well enough to travel. Obviously he is
being held virtually incommunicado in Germany for political reasons.
He is only allowed to speak to staff assigned to “treat” (and
sneakily interrogate) him. His family can’t even call him. Buried
in the third to last paragraph of a seventeen paragraph
story the Times casually drops this stunner: “At some point,
he will speak by phone with his family, and be reunited with them.”
At some point he will speak with! Check the disingenuous
passive sense! He’s being held incommunicado. His next stop,
we are told, will be another Army “medical facility” in Texas,
where his family will be allowed to see him, supposedly. (The Times
phrased it as Bergdahl will “be reunited with them.”) NY
Times, “As Soldier Heals,”
op cit.
6] Details on the former Taliban prisoners’ condition was reported by the BBC, and
picked up by NPR, June 8.
Let’s let the very funny and incisive
cartoonist Brian McFadden have the last word for today:
No comments:
Post a Comment