Amazing articles in Haaretz
and Foreign Policy. The Mossad ran a false flag operation where they
posed as CIA officers and recruited Pakistani terrorists to commit
assassinations and other attacks inside Iran in2007-8. (I wonder of the
self-proclaimed “newspaper of record,” the NY Times, will report it, or
the rest of the U.S. corporate media.)
Working mostly in London, Mossad agents with U.S. passports posed as CIA officers to recruit members of
“Jundallah,” a Pakistan-based Sunni terrorist group. (One of Pakistan's leading
industries is the creation of Sunni terrorist organizations. Religious fanatic
factories called “madrassas” were set up under military dictator Zia ul-Haq,
one of Reagan's favorite dictators. And the ISI mentors, protects, and directs
various terror orgs. Pakistan's permanent military oligarchy sponsors and
provides sanctuary for Islamic terrorists as a matter of bedrock strategic
policy.)
An unnamed U.S.
“intelligence officer” told Foreign Policy: "It's amazing what the
Israelis thought they could get away with.""They apparently didn't
give a damn what we thought."
Well, they've
gotten away with worse than that. They got away with trying to sink the U.S.
Navy spy ship U.S.S. Liberty in 1967. [See the book Assault On The Liberty,
by a former Navy officer who was part of the crew during the attack.] And in
the 1950s they bombed U.S. Installations in Egypt to make it look like the
Egyptians did it and thus turn the U.S. against Egypt. They suffered no
punishment for that either. So what's the big deal about using stolen/forged
U.S. passports to masquerade as CIA agents to run terror ops inside Iran? Worse
that can happen, Iran will blame the U.S. and the U.S. And Iran will end up in
a war. (Hey, that's good for Israel! It's a no-lose situation for them!
No wonder they did it!)
The Israelis
would have had to assume that the Pakis military terror-masters, the ISI, would
have found out about this since they host “Jundallah.” Did they calculate that
the Pakis would figure this would put the U.S. In their debt, another chit to
call in in the U.S.' “War on Terror”? As the U.S. secret police official said,
the Israelis “apparently didn't give a damn what we thought.” [“Jundallah”
probably means something like “We Are Holier Than You So We Need To Kill You.”]
And why should
they? Israel actually controls the U.S. Congress. American politicians heartily
endorse Israeli killings of U.S. Citizens who act in solitarity with
Palestinians (such as on the aid flotillas attacked by Israel) or totally
ignore such murders. (Rachel Corrie, assassinated by Caterpillar bulldozer when
she wouldn't stand aside from a Palestinian home being destroyed by Israel. And
a young Jewish-American artist had her eye shot out by Israeli troops for
protesting with Palestinians. You'll have to go to the Village Voice to
read about that one.) American Congressmen act like members of Saddam Hussein's
Baath party, trying to outdo one another in their proclamations of fealty to
Israel, as the Baathists would loudly roclaim loyalty to Hussein. Apparently losing
an election is death to an American politician.
No one should
blame Israel for this. Why shouldn't Israel pursue its own national interests
to the max? That's what nations are expected to do. The blame is entirely on
the U.S., for being Israel's BITCH.
The irony is
that the U.S. expects every other nation on earth to subordinate its own
interests to the U.S.,' yet submits almost completely to Israeli domination.
It's kind of like rich and powerful men who pay dominatrixes to lord it over
them and abuse them. Is some kind of weird dominance-submission thing going on
here? Does overweening power create a need for submission in some powerful men
and nations? Interesting question.
Of course, there
are simple political and economic explanations for this strange phenomenon.
American Jewish money, organization, and media/entertainment industry dominance
power “hydraulics” explanation. No need for psychoanalysis. (But I bet you
could have fun doing a psychoanalysis!)
Question for
historians: are there any other known cases of a much smaller nation dominating
a much more powerful one?
By the way,
Israel denied the story. So the alternative explanation would have to be that
the CIA deliberately planted disinformation hostile to Israel in Foreign
Policy, a major publication aimed at the U.S. foreign policy nomenklatura,
complete with forged documents. This would trick U.S. policymakers. I rather
doubt U.S. Congresspeople, so slavishly subservient to Israel, would stand for
this. Nor would it help Obama, facing reelection and already vilified by the
GOP and rightwing Zionists as an Israel-hater.(Absurd, I know, but crazy people
are a dominant force in U.S. Politics.)
I rather doubt that Obama's new CIA head, General Petraeus, would be
such an ingrate. So I credit the FP article.
(A recent
example of Congress' subordination to Israel is the over-the-top fan club type
reception Congress gave Israeli PM Binyamin Netanyahu when he addressed them-
more standing ovations than Obama got during his most recent speech to them. By
the way, it is Binyamin, not “Benjamin.” Similarly, Rudolph
Giuliani, not “Rudy.” Marion G. Robertson, not “Pat.” Malcolm Stevenson Forbes,
not “Steve.” These aren't “regular guys,” U.S. media propagandists.)
[“False Flag” -Foreign
Policy.]
[“Jundallah:Profile Of A Sunni Extremist Group” -Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty]
[“Iran accusesUS and Britain of role in killing of nuclear scientist” -the guardian]
jasonzenith.blogspot.com
taboo-truths.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment